Dispatches From The Feminist Front Line: Choose Your Weapons Carefully

edmund_george_portrait

Hilarious, but ultimately not that useful in a battle situation. Image via thiswastv.

There’s trouble in the trenches, people. Yes, the feminist frontline is once again in full mud flinging flow after an article in Tuesday’s Guardian posited that while a humourous approach to battle was much more fun for all involved (including the patriarchy, shudder), lately everyone’s too busy standing around making cracks to care about gaining ground.

Anger is apparently what we need. Anger and bile to propel us through the swamp of No WoMan’s Land to that mythical place we call Equality.

Apart from all the noise and mess, which does rather distract from matters of more significance, if we keep focusing our energy on tactics, uniforms, personnel and equipment, we’re going to be bloody knackered by the time we do haul ourselves over the top. Consensus is the most effective weapon we have – a blunderbuss to blast away the divide and conquer mentality that has made women judging and competing with one another over hair, clothes and make-up in civvie life the norm.

Right now it sits, forgotten in the corner and until we stop arguing long enough to take a look around, it’ll stay there.

Along with the women not fortunate enough to have a voice.

Morrissey: Notes From A 21st Century Newsroom

Morrissey+Morrissey+In+Concert+QeCSKsSIE5dl

Image: Mike Pont/Getty Images North America.

If I feel it, then others surely must. That’s the only thought that sustains me.

Morrissey, rookiemag.com, 26 02 2013

Editor: Wait. No. That’s not going to interest anyone, despite it’s hopeful simplicity and beauty. Go back to the interview and find something more provocative we can use to stir up the readers.

Footsteps recede as a weary, underpaid staffer returns to her cubicle to scroll through the interview again.

War, I thought, was the most negative aspect of male heterosexuality. If more men were homosexual, there would be no wars, because homosexual men would never kill other men, whereas heterosexual men love killing other men. They even get medals for it. Women don’t go to war to kill other women. Wars and armies and nuclear weapons are essentially heterosexual hobbies.

Morrissey, rookiemag.com, 26 02 2013

Editor: That’s more like it! Post away!

Hilary Mantel: Something For The Weakened

Hilary+Mantel+Costa+Book+Year+Awards+tzRBZbUFrXVl

Insert spiteful but deserved because she was rude about ‘Our Kate’ caption here. Image: Stuart Wilson/Getty Images Europe.

Two weeks ago yesterday, Hilary Mantel spoke for over an hour to a sold out audience as part of the London Review of Books series of Winter Lectures. Entitled ‘Royal Bodies’, the author spoke of our fascination with the appearance and physiological details of royal family members from Ann Boleyn to Kate Middleton. She discussed fashion, pregnancy, perceptions, pressures and the social &  political complications that can arise from choosing the wrong outfit.

It was, as you might expect from a two time Man Booker prize winner, a thoroughly entertaining, insightful and at times appropriately caustic response to what is an abiding obsession of the British.

In days gone by, a person like Hilary Mantel, who has dedicated much of her life to the study of a specific subject, would have been considered an authority figure. Her evocative prose would have given pause to those of us less inclined to spend our time absorbed in literature and perhaps inspire some to further study.

Today we prefer to be guided by lazy news editors, who cherry pick specific contextual references to a current royal figure and present them as prima facie evidence of the author’s spitefulness. Far from being a figure of inspiration, Hilary Mantel is instantly transformed into yet another target of the generalised, apathetic ire we prefer to expend our excess energy upon.

At this point, ‘off with their heads’ seems like the least we should be demanding.

Reeva Steenkamp: A Little Respect, Perhaps?

731977001

Image via @suzanne_moore.

If you’re still undecided in the debate about using semi-naked young women to sell newspapers, I’d like you to ask you a question.

Can an editorial team who thought it appropriate to lead their coverage of Reeva Steenkamp’s death with a photo of her in a bikini be trusted to make any decisions regarding propriety?

No. Quite clearly they f*****g can’t.

John Galliano: Go About Your Business. Nothing To See Here

newyorkpostjpg-bd9615938ac9e0a6

Image via oregonlive.

The New York Post is claiming John Galliano was mocking Jewish Hasidic culture on Tuesday when he stepped out of a New York apartment building wearing a “parody of Jew attire“.  The British designer was banished from the fashion industry after a 2011 incident in which he reportedly insulted Jewish people and claimed to love Hitler, but has recently made a tentative return via a temporary residency at Oscar De La Renta’s New York studio.

While the New York Post are obviously trying to create a visual stir to outdo that presented by Galliano, their desire to whip up controversy is almost embarrassingly obvious beneath the facade. We can already comfortably assume from his career choice that clothes are fairly important to John Galliano, so it’s unlikely the outfit he chose was simply the first he tripped over  that day. He was making a provocative statement that he was hoping people would react to.

He doesn’t care whether it’s positive or negative. But perversely, by responding to it, the NY Post and other media outlets could be accused of casually trading off and diluting the Jewish community’s right to be offended by genuine anti-Semitic gestures. This is not an anti-Semitic statement. I repeat, it’s a provocative statement. This is a fashion designer, the enfant terrible of the fashion world, using clothing to create a stir that will keep him in the news. That’s his job.

Perhaps the journalists at the NY Post should consider doing theirs.

FEMEN: What Women Want

'The Grandmaster' Premiere - 63rd Berlinale International Film Festival

Sasha Shevchenko’s red carpet moment at the Berlin Film Festival. Image: Target Presse Agentur Gmbh/WireImage.

Apparently, every woman wants a red carpet moment. Those few seconds when eyes and lenses fall upon her alone, and she willingly sacrifices herself to the media scrutiny that will make or break her. She’ll spend weeks, months, selecting the clothing, jewellery, footwear, make-up, stance and words that will decide her fate, but ultimately she’ll have no control over how she’s interpreted.

It’s no wonder people don’t approve of FEMEN. They will keep reminding us that a few of the most fortunate women in the world looking pretty is infinitely more important to our sense of cultural wellbeing than the exploitation of the rest.

Danica Patrick: Egregious Easter Egg


Taken at face value, this ad is offensive to so many groups of people, it would be an exercise in futility to claim it as especially egregious towards any one of them in particular.

However, if you’re a feminist, bored and looking for a reason to be pissed off today, take a look at the woman introducing the model and the geek. She’s Danica Patrick, the most successful female racing driver in the history of the universe. She races on an equal footing with the guys and counts a fourth place in an Indy500 race as one of her biggest achievements to date.

She’s potentially one of the most positive role models young women have in society today – an object lesson in how self-belief, hard work and stubbornness can propel you straight on through those glass ceilings to the penthouse view of your choice. Which makes her decision to take part in such a moronic, outdated and genuinely embarrassing advertising campaign all the more depressing.

You think feminists are a bunch of miserable cows? With this kind of provocation, it’s hardly surprising, is it?

The Argument For Gun Control: In Pictures

oldwomanwithagun-vi

Mad. Image via manlyweddingblog.

As we know, it’s tremendously convenient to portray supporters of the right to bear arms in the United States as intolerant, irresponsible right wing lunatics who’ll shoot your face off with an AK-47 if you even think about trying to pry it out of their hot, sweaty hand.

Continue reading “The Argument For Gun Control: In Pictures”

Deutsche Bank Protests: Seen It, Done It, Bought The Balaclava

GERMANY-BANKING-COMPANY-EARNINGS-DEUTSCHEBANK

Image: DANIEL ROLAND/AFP/Getty Images.

fempussCall yourself an activist? Think you’re blazing a trail in ‘Protest Wear’ because you turned up outside Deutsche Bank this morning dressed in an eye-catching, photographer-baiting outfit comprising balaclava, blank mask and cut out shapes covering your boobies?

I was wearing this six months ago. Don’t think that just because you’ve managed to convince the local farmers to pose as security guards, you’ll be safe from my royalty claims.

Intellectual property is theft too, my friend. And as FEMEN have proven on a number of occasions, there’s nowt more scary than an angry half-naked woman with a marker pen and a mission.

Chris Brown: A Sketch In Self Awareness

chris-brown-painting-467

Rapper, actor and convicted domestic violence enthusiast Chris Brown posted this on Instagram yesterday, with the caption “Painting the way I feel today.”

It  pissed a lot of people off, but I’m bemused as to why. I looks to me like an ill-conceived, insensitive parody of a man. That fits, doesn’t it?